Friday, 27 December 2024

Drama as a tool for resistance


 

This will feature prominently in my final Schellberg book and there has already been a hint of it in The Class Letter.

Drama actually remained important to the Nazis and we may be astounded that Anika’s drama academy remained open throughout World War II. Of course there would be difficulties with young men going off to war to fight and the young women having to fit their work experience and war work around studying.

The Nazis of course allowed some forms of the theatre and banned others. Of course they used theatres for propaganda. World War II was not just a military war. It was also a cultural war. Theatre remained important and indeed several theatres were renovated at this time. German language theatre even sprang up in occupied countries.

Cleary the drama academies were kept going to provide a work force for these theatres and also the thriving film industry.

Shakespeare was one of the few foreign playwrights allowed. Naturally Goethe and Schiller plays were performed. Brecht’s were not, as one might guess. Brecht left Germany in fear for his life.

In an earlier post I spoke about Swing Youth.  Anika and her friends supported by Tante Gisela will build on this and take drama underground into a type of Speakeasy setting.

We’re definitely in the realm of fiction now. And yet. Could something of this nature actually have happened?  I’ll definitely be exploring ‘what if’.  

Also, Gisela will have several encounters with a mysterious figure who offers her several pathways into resistance.


Monday, 18 November 2024

More about the Swing Youth

 



The first “Swing Cliques” appeared in Hamburg in 1935-1936.

The movement itself started in properly 1939. It became particularly popular in Vienna, but also in big towns in Germany. For some time it was the answer to the edict that all young people must join a youth movement. They chose this one!  

The people who joined this group were also known as Schlurfs. They met to dance to swing music and they expressed their resistance to the Nazi regime through their behaviour and the way they dressed.

They weren’t all that rigidly organised and just met casually.  May this kept them safe for a while. Their main motivation was their love of American jazz music, the exact music that Hitler claimed was decadent.

Jazz wasn’t forbidden at first. The government recognised that people needed music to boost morale. Even so, as early as 1935 the upholders of the master race recognised that this music was presented by black people and the Nazis even perceived Jewishness in it. The musician Benny Goodman, the Pied Piper of New York, had to be suppressed; Goodman was Jewish.

Gradually jazz performers were forced to leave the country. Perhaps this made the music seem even more exotic to these youngsters.  

Many of the newsreels showed anti-American propaganda but young people would flock to the cinemas to see the newsreels where they might catch a glimpse Americans of their generation doing the lindy hop.

There was a dress code: boys would wear long over-sized checked sports jackets and shoes with crepe soles. They had collar-length hair. They carried an umbrella whether it was needed or not. They smoked pipes and they liked to wear Union jack pins. They often called their groups clubs and added other names that would provoke the Nazi authorities e.g. The Churchill Club. A further act off rebellion was that they often used Jewish words.

The girls too had longer hair which they wore loose instead of  in the plaits favoured by the Nazi regime. They also wore coloured nail polish and lipstick.  

Were the Swingers political? There is some debate about this. They didn’t try to sabotage Nazi efforts. They just wanted to have a good time and resented the discipline imposed by the authorities. They mainly came from middle class families. They said they weren’t against the Nazis but that the Nazis were against them. They weren’t entirely passive though; they would fight Hitler Youth groups on the streets. And in their own way they resisted indoctrination.

They had a loud life style. They would greet each with “Swing Heil” instead of “Sieg Heil”.  They were daring. One venue altered the word “Swing Verboten” – Swing forbidden” to Swing Erboten “Swing Offered” They drank heavily. They were just after a good time. They would speak English and dress and behave like dandies.

This life-style was criminalised by 1940 and there were raids on music events.  This is going to feature in my final Schellberg novel. But they still manage to meet in secret. They met in private homes and often in cellars beneath bars and other businesses.   

Around seventy young swingers were rounded up in Hamburg and deported to concentration camps.   

Their life style may seem a little frivolous.  Yet the rebellion was nevertheless deep. The young people had seen their parents lose face as they struggled with the hyperinflation and then the depression. This jazz-infused life was part of a dream of freedom.  

   

Tuesday, 15 October 2024

Protests against the Nazi regime

 


The church opposed the regime as early as 1937 when the Pope's message 'With Burning Concern' attacked Hitler as 'a mad prophet with repulsive arrogance' and was read in every Catholic Church.

The Catholic Archbishop of Munster, von Galen, led a successful campaign to end euthanasia of mentally-disabled people

A protestant pastor Dietrich Bonhöffer, was linked to the bomb plot.

The main youth opposition group was the Edelweiss Pirates, based in the Rhineland. They reacted to the discipline of the Hitler Youth by daubing anti-Nazi slogans and singing pre-1933 folk songs. The White Rose group was formed by students at Munich University in 1943. They published anti-Nazi leaflets and marched through the city in protest at Nazi policies.

During the war, ‘Swing Youth’ and ‘Jazz Youth’ groups were formed. These were young people who rejected Nazi values, drank alcohol and danced to jazz. Jazz of course was labelled ‘degenerate’ by the Nazis.  

Perhaps the most widespread and persistent opposition to the Nazi regime came from ordinary German workers, often helped by communists, who posted anti-Nazi posters and graffiti, or organised strikes. In Dortmund the vast majority of men imprisoned in the city’s jail were industrial workers. Workers went on strike over high food prices in 1935 and during the Berlin Olympics in 1936.

The most well-known demonstration is probably the Rosenstrasse protest in Berlin between 27 February and 6 March 1943. It was initiated by wives and non-Jewish relations of Jews and Mischlinge. Many of their Jewish husbands were incarcerated in Rosenstrasse and were threatened with deportation. .     

For days the women shouted ”Give us our husbands back.”                                                                                 

Saturday, 21 September 2024

Overtly disobeying the Nazis


 

Not easy?

The price of civil disobedience would have been very high.

Was Hans Elder’s “Heil Edler!” enough?

There are stories of ordinary German citizens taking white handkerchiefs out of their pockets as allied aircraft flew overhead. How brave would you have to be to show resistance?

Something defiantly went on in Stuttgart. How that little special class for the disabled, special needs children and children with learning difficulties, survive?  

The Rosenstrasse protest

The Rosenstrasse protest of February 1943 was the only open, collective protest for Jews during the Third Reich. It was sparked by the arrest and threatened deportation to death camps of 1,800 Jewish men married to non-Jewish women. They were "full" Jews in the sense of the 1935 Nuremberg Laws and the Gestapo aimed to deport as many as it could without drawing attention to the Holocaust or alienating the "racial" public. Before these men could be deported, their wives and other relatives rallied outside the building in Rosenstrasse where the men were held. About 6,000 people, mostly women, rallied in shifts in the winter cold for over a week. Eventually Himmler, worried about the effect on civilian morale, gave in and allowed the arrested men to be released. Some who had already been deported and were on their way to Auschwitz were brought back. There was no retaliation against the protesters, and most of the Jewish men survived.

 

Waitstill and Martha Sharp  

In 2016 Artemis Joukowsky an author, filmmaker, and socially conscious venture capitalist, the grandson of Waitstill and Martha Sharp has spent decades researching his grandparents’ heroic rescue missions in Europe. In 1939, the Reverend Waitstill Sharp, a young Unitarian minister, and his wife, Martha, a social worker, accepted a mission from the American Unitarian Association: they were to leave their home and young children in Wellesley, Massachusetts, and travel to Prague, Czechoslovakia, to help address the mounting refugee crisis. Seventeen ministers had been asked to undertake this mission and had declined; Rev. Sharp was the first to accept the call for volunteers in Europe.

Armed with only $40,000, Waitstill and Martha quickly learned the art of spy craft and undertook dangerous rescue and relief missions across war-torn Europe, saving refugees, political dissidents, and Jews on the eve of World War II. After narrowly avoiding the Gestapo themselves, the Sharps returned to Europe in 1940 as representatives of the newly formed Unitarian Service Committee and continued their relief efforts in Vichy France. They were a little on the perimeter and couldn’t have quite the same experience as those living an ordinary daily life under the Nazi regime.  

 

Everyday people

Yet there were also all those small acts by ordinary people, living normal lives who:

  • Refused to make the Nazi salute
  • Missed their Jewish doctors, lawyers and shopkeepers
  • Wished their own sons and daughters didn’t need to be part of the Hitler Youth or the BDM
  • Were brave enough to grumble about what the Nazis were doing
  • would offer a place in an air raid shelter to a young Jewish boy

Even here there was the opportunity for humanity to offer tis finest.  

 

Tuesday, 27 August 2024

Christian Resistance to the Holocaust and the Nazi Regime


 

We have examples of this in the cycle:

Renate’s teachers generally

They resisted in two ways:

  • They didn’t make her join in some Nazi activities, including joining the BDM (the girls’ equivalent of the Hitler Youth.  This latter may sound a little strange. But Renate did look quite Jewish and the resemblance between her an Anne Frank is startling.
  • They tried to make her as invisible as possible

Sister Kuna

As an adult Renate did mention a Sister Kuna. We never did know the full story but we know she was punished for protecting Renate. This is where I’ve used this writerly tool of exploration though imagination, what you know and ‘what if’ to try to work out what might have happened to her.

Father Maxfeld

Again we know he was punished for expressing anti-Nazi views.  We don’t know the extent of what happened. However, it is probably similar to what happened in a late chapter in The Class Letter (not yet published).

Frau Braun

She definitely really existed and quietly sat back and observed what was going on.  She steered the girls who wrote the class letters towards taking care. In the first book I have her telling the story of exactly what happened to Sister Kuna, Father Maxfeld and their two class mates Renate Edler and Elfriede Kaiser. In The Class Letter we get more detail.

The relationship churches and the Nazi regime

The Nazis had a strange relationship with the church.  Women were expect to concern themselves with Kinder, Küche, Kirche, (children, kitchen, church) yet church schools were closed. Indeed the closing of one school is crucial to the whole of the Schellberg cycle. But don’t Christian values find much that is wrong in the Nazi regime and certain in the Holocaust?

The church’s attitude

Indeed before 1933 some bishops prohibited Catholics in their dioceses from joining the Nazi Party. However, that had to change as Hitler came to power. And yet as late as the 1939 census most Germans were claiming to be Christian. Perhaps we also need to remember that people always think they are right – Trump, Putin, Hitler for example,  and therefore that God will be on their side.

   

                                                                                          

Monday, 22 July 2024

Dragging feet on new initiatives

 



What must it have been like for Hans Edler? He was designing weapons that were to be used to destroy the United Kingdom. His wife and child were living in England.

As I wrote his story it occurred to me that he may have taken his time. He may have delayed tests or deliberately held up progress on perfecting this horrid killing machine.

A few weeks after I’d written this episode I read that indeed engineers working on the V2  thought it was such a horrible weapon that they deliberately went slowly with is manufacture.

Had those German engineers a greater conscience that those who worked on the nuclear bombs or is it just true that the latter didn’t realise how powerful those weapons were?

Werner von Braun and Walter Dornberger were two well-known engineers who worked  in this area.    

There are stories too of officials processing paperwork slowly.

Renate was protected to some extent by her teachers.  They didn’t force her to join the BDM or to make the Nazi salute. They weren’t exactly hiding her but they just took their time making everything official

When the Waldorf School was inspected, the official delayed sending in his report. It didn’t stop the closure of the school but it did take attention away from them and so the special class was almost forgotten about and continued in the basement of the house that Clara Lehrs built.

Oskar Schindler is of course well-known for employing people in his factory and designating  them as  essential workers.

Georg Ferdinand Duckwitz, a German diplomat stationed in Denmark, informed the Danish authorities of the deportation of Danish Jews. This allowed for a large rescue operation and 7,200 Jews were ferried safely across to Sweden.       

Thursday, 4 July 2024

Turning a blind eye to others not obeying the rules


 

During the Nazi era, many individuals and groups turned a blind eye to others who were not obeying Nazi rules. This passive complicity was driven by a mix of fear, sympathy, moral agreement, and pragmatic survival strategies. Understanding these dynamics sheds light on the complexities of human behavior under oppressive regimes.

Ordinary Citizens

Among ordinary Germans, there was a significant number who, while not actively resisting the Nazis themselves, chose to overlook the actions of those who did. This could include neighbors who knew that a Jewish family was being hidden in the attic next door but chose not to report it. For many, this silence was a form of passive resistance; they did not agree with Nazi policies but were too fearful of the potential repercussions to actively oppose them.

For example, in some instances, when Gestapo agents came searching for Jews, neighbors might have pretended not to notice the suspicious activity or provided vague and unhelpful information. This passive non-compliance created a small but significant buffer against the total enforcement of Nazi policies.

Civil Servants and Police

Some civil servants and members of the police force also turned a blind eye to acts of disobedience. While some were ideologically aligned with the Nazis, others privately disagreed with the regime but were unable to openly resist due to the risk of severe punishment. These individuals sometimes engaged in "work-to-rule" tactics, where they would strictly follow procedures to the letter, thereby slowing down processes and allowing time for resistors to escape or hide.

For instance, a police officer might deliberately delay the filing of a report or a bureaucrat might "lose" paperwork that would have resulted in the arrest or deportation of a Jewish family. These small acts of bureaucratic sabotage could make a significant difference in individual cases.

Business Owners and Employers

Certain business owners and employers played a role in quietly aiding those who defied Nazi regulations. They might hire Jewish workers under false identities or provide forged documentation to protect them. These employers recognized the risks but chose to prioritize human decency over strict adherence to the law.

A well-known example is Oskar Schindler, who, while actively saving Jews, also relied on the complicity of his workers and associates who chose not to report his actions. Many other less famous employers did similar things, providing crucial aid without drawing attention to themselves.

Religious Institutions

Religious institutions often found themselves in a difficult position under Nazi rule. While official church positions varied, individual clergy members sometimes turned a blind eye to resistance activities. Churches, monasteries, and convents provided shelter to Jews and political dissidents, relying on the silence of their congregations and communities to protect those they were hiding.

In the Netherlands, for example, the clergy played a significant role in the resistance. Many Catholic and Protestant leaders did not actively preach against the Nazis from the pulpit but instead used their positions to quietly support and protect those resisting the regime.

International Diplomats

Some diplomats from neutral or Allied countries, stationed in Nazi-occupied territories, chose to turn a blind eye to their own nations' restrictions and helped Jews escape. For instance, Raoul Wallenberg, a Swedish diplomat in Hungary, issued protective passports and sheltered Jews in buildings designated as Swedish territory.

Conclusion

Turning a blind eye to the disobedience of Nazi laws was a nuanced and often dangerous form of passive resistance. This silent complicity by ordinary citizens, civil servants, business owners, religious figures, and diplomats played a crucial role in undermining the Nazi regime's total control. Their actions, or inactions, highlight the moral complexities and varied forms of resistance that emerged in response to one of history's most oppressive regimes.


Monday, 10 June 2024

Paying lip service



Giving lip-service to Nazi engagement.   

Hans Edler had this down to a fine art. He would always say “Heil Edler” rather than Heil Hitler.” He probably mumbled in order to get away with it.

Many of the examples of this in the Schellberg books come from anecdotes that Renate James, née Edler recited to us.

It spooked his wife; she thought someone would hear and they would get into a lot of trouble about it. He didn’t worry though. His salute remained firm and “Edler” probably sounded enough like “Hitler” for it to be convincing.

And then there is some story-telling. Notably there is the incident of him doing this when the telegram boy arrives. His wife remonstrates with him. This begins a little light relief in the text. There is some foreshadowing here; a later telegram will say that Hani has chicken pox and Renate cannot come to visit. Renate knows that this cannot be true; she and Hani have both already had chicken pox. Something sinister is going on.  

Käthe Edler finds  herself accidentally at one of the Nuremberg rallies she is astounded that she actually also says Edler just as her  husband always did.  Again when she comes face to face with the Führer she uses Edler.

Hans Edler was cautious; he at least raised his arm like a good Nazi should. His daughter was an entirely different matter; she refused to do the Hitler salute at all. This may have been partly to do with her teachers. They hid her in plain sight. Yet they felt they couldn’t force her to join the BDM or salute the Führer. It wouldn’t be right for a young Jewish girl.

One can imagine as well, some households where rather than saluting the dictator they cursed him – in private, behind closed doors and under four eyes.           

Tuesday, 28 May 2024

Grumbling Behind Closed Doors: a daughter and mother are at loggerheads

 


Can you imagine some of the scenarios that might have happened?  For instance:

Mutti:

Lotte, can you help me with Friedrich and Hans?

Lotte:

Mutti, I can’t. I’ve got to get to my BDM meeting.

Mutti:

Can’t you miss it just for once?

Lotte:

You know I can’t. We have our first aid test today.

Mutti.

I could do with some first aid. Shouldn’t your priority be to help the family? They want us to have more children. Don’t they know how difficult this can be? Surely if you’re helping at home, helping to bring up decent German citizens, you’re doing your bit.

Lotte:

I’ve got to go now or I’ll be late.

Mutti

They haven’t really thought this through. Go on then.

 

BDM leader:

Heil Hitler. Lotte Kaiser, you’re late.

Lotte:

Heil Hitler. I’m sorry. I had to help Mutti with the twins.

BDM leader:

That’s a sloppy apology for saluting the Führer. You’ll help your two brothers better by being fully here.

Lotte:

Mutti’s finding it hard. It’s all very well having more children but with Vati away fighting and me not available to help ….

BDM leader:

Is your Mutti criticising Herr Hitler?

Lotte (bows her head and shrugs)

She wouldn’t do that.

BDM leader:

I should hope not. She should be honoured.